Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 03:19:46 06/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 09, 2003 at 02:51:02, Christophe Theron wrote: >On June 09, 2003 at 00:50:29, Mike S. wrote: > >>Recently it has been critized that SSDF doesn't test King 3.23 (yet), it has >>been discussed, explained why not, etc.etc. >> >>(Purists of 40/2h shouldn't continue to read :-)) >> >>I think nowadays, 10m+10s can provide a perfectly valid comparison too. On this >>rating list created by Mr. Klaus Wlotzka for CSS Magazine, > > > >10+10 or 2+2 are the worst time controls you can imagine for Chess Tiger because >it does not handle Fischer time controls correctly. > >Actually you can do even worse by playing 1+100 for example, but 10+10 is >already a big problem for Tiger. > >So I'm surprised that it ends up at such a good place... > > > > Christophe And Frenzee doesn't have king safety or passed pawn knowledge, so please ignore all games where that is a factor. :) -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.