Author: Peter Berger
Date: 12:30:45 06/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 09, 2003 at 15:07:00, Christophe Theron wrote: >Some interesting numbers: > >SSDF elo rating of Chess Tiger 14.9a for PalmOS running on Palm m515 @42MHz: >2101 (+/- the usual margin of error that can be found on the SSDF site). > >Estimated SSDF elo rating of Chess Tiger 15.0 for PalmOS running on Palm >Tungsten-C @400MHz: 2290 (explanations and formulas can be found at >http://www.chestiger.com, click on the "FAQ" link). > >Now here is a list of interesting computers or programs tested by the SSDF: > >??? Chess Tiger 15.0 TungstenC (estimate) 2290 ? ? ? ? ? > 96 Tasc R30 v. 2.5 2274 41 -38 343 69% 2136 >104 Fritz 3.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2242 18 -19 1438 42% 2299 >111 Mephisto London 68 030 36 MHz 2216 71 -63 122 68% 2080 >113 Chess Machine 30-32 MHz Schröder 3.1 2205 30 -29 586 64% 2102 >137 Chess Tiger 14.9 Palm m515 16MB 42MHz 2101 69 -74 100 39% 2180 >144 Mephisto Atlanta SH7000 20 MHz 2087 29 -27 667 68% 1956 >154 Sapphire II 2009 34 -32 464 63% 1918 >161 Fidelity Mach IV 68020 20 MHz 1974 18 -18 1495 48% 1988 >184 Chess Genius 1.5 Palm m515 16MB 42MHz 1870 69 -78 100 32% 2002 >185 Mephisto Roma 68000 12 MHz 1869 18 -18 1519 56% 1827 > >(the last two lines show that a Palm m515 running at 42MHz has approximately the >same processing power as a 68000 running at 12MHz because ChessGenius 1.5 for >Palm has the Mephisto Roma chess engine, source is the Chess Genius web site) > > >Whe can tell me the SSDF rating of Belle and Cray Blitz? > > > > Christophe Let's try some others: 86 MChess Pro 5.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2306 26 -25 769 63% 2214 89 Rebel 7.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2301 26 -25 759 61% 2219 ??? Chess Tiger 15.0 TungstenC (estimate) 2290 ? ? ? ? ? 92 Junior 4.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2288 22 -22 1035 42% 2343 98 Genius 4.0 DOS 486/50-66 MHz 2266 23 -23 900 49% 2270 94 Shredder 1.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2283 59 -58 145 53% 2264 105 Mephisto Genius 2.0 486/50-66 MHz 2235 23 -23 917 58% 2176 137 Chess Tiger 14.9 Palm m515 16MB 42MHz 2101 69 -74 100 39% 2180 Do you think this is realistic? I have the feeling that the non-active oldtimers are not rated accurately anymore. But of course I can't prove and I have no personal experience how strong Tiger plays on the Tungsten. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.