Author: blass uri
Date: 08:45:57 10/20/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 1998 at 10:37:36, Nouveau wrote: > >On October 20, 1998 at 01:36:22, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>Here's result for 20 games match with 60/5 time limit (under Winboard): >> >>Comet 0.5 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0.5 0 0.5 1 0.5 0 1 0 = 8 >>Wcrafty 0.5 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 0 1 = 12 >> >>So they are very close to each other in playing strength. >> >>Jouni > >12-8 is very close ?????????? > >When can we say : Crafty is better than Comet ? 18-2 ? > >I don't understand these statistical stuff : I can't imagine a 12-8 result in a >match between 2 GM with a conclusion like "They are very close in playing >stregth". > >Why do we need hundreds, maybe thousands of games between computers to evaluate >relative strength, when few dozens are more than needed for human GMs ? I do not think that few dozens are more than needed for human GMs Uri > >Jeff
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.