Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:12:28 06/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 10, 2003 at 03:34:27, Les Fernandez wrote: >On June 09, 2003 at 21:46:43, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On June 06, 2003 at 11:27:27, Les Fernandez wrote: >> >>>I have an experiment I would like to run using the entire set of WAC positions. >>>Can someone send me the epd strings for the entire set and then I was wondering >>>if when I am done with them if someone would be interested in running the entire >>>set. I think we may find some interesting results when I am done with them. >> >>It's been done by many people, including myself > >Hi Dann, >I am aware that alot of work has been done with them but I am not aware of all >the tpyes of things that have been tried. > >> >>Are you sure you want to reproduce that information again? > >Hmmm when you say reproduce it again Dann what exactly has been done? > >> >>What time control are you interested in? > >I was going to ask you about the time setting Dann. Perhaps if you can provide >me with some data that has already been generated that might help me decide on a >time. Basically I would be interested to see the right number of solutions >(from the 300 set) with respect to time. How is it done? Does one set a total >time and then see how many of the 300 positions his engine can solve or is it >based on a constant set time per position? Also Dann in your opinion which >engine seems to score well on the 300 positions and what kind of hardware was it >running on? > >Although I will have to give it some thought I am not necessarily interested in >the best engine. I am more interested I think in finding a time somewhere in >between the best and the worst case scenarios. Will have to think about that. > >Thanks, > >Les I have a test run from an older version, 60 seconds per move, that got 300 correct on a 21264 / 600mhz alpha. Recent versions will not solve #230, but get the rest in under 60 seconds on my dual xeon 2.8. Here is a run at 10 seconds per move on my dual 2.8 xeon: total positions searched.......... 300 number right...................... 299 number wrong...................... 1 percentage right.................. 99 percentage wrong.................. 0 total nodes searched.............. 201494040 average search depth.............. 4.6 nodes per second.................. 2327527
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.