Author: Robin Smith
Date: 23:49:20 06/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 10, 2003 at 19:58:07, margolies,marc wrote: >I have to think more about what >you are saying, but my first impression suggests that you are interested in >chess analysis in order to discover the 'credibility' of a chess engine based >upon what you already understand about a position, instead of say, as an >exploratory tool to uncover the position's 'secrets.' I am interested in both, and more. Checking engine 'credibility' is part of the reason for run the gauntlet style tournaments where one side always gets the same color. Other types of touraments can be used for other reasons. > i hope this doesn't seem harsh to you, Not at all. >You may deny that it is stochastic.. >i might call it a refined stochastic approach with technique. OK, refined stochastic sounds right. But NOT just looking at the tournament final score. This is, as you rightly pointed out, very noisy. Robin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.