Author: Pavel Blokhine
Date: 22:29:11 06/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 12, 2003 at 00:35:41, Aaron Gordon wrote: >On June 11, 2003 at 19:28:37, Pavel Blokhine wrote: > >>On June 11, 2003 at 18:54:27, Aaron Gordon wrote: >> >>>On June 11, 2003 at 18:45:55, Rafael Vasquez wrote: >>> >>>>Aaron >>>> >>>>I have a Biostar M7VIG which gave me problems with a >>>>Thundebird XP 2000+ which finally I managed to run at >>>>1602 mhz using a software.The software is warpspeeder >>>>version 0.95 and I'm using Win2000. >>>>Do you think That your chips can run in that motherboard? >>>> >>>>Rafael >>> >>>Your board should at least be able to run 2250MHz speed (1.65v) at 166fsb. >>>That board doesn't have 3 or 4 phase power setup so I can't guarantee it will do >>>more, but, I have a 15 day money back guarantee. If it doesn't work, no >>>problem.. send it back. >>> >>>Your best bet would be to pick up an Abit NF7-S v2.0 or Epox 8RDA >>>(motherboards). You'd be able to hit 2.4GHz/1.75v with ease on one of those >>>boards and will have full multiplier and fsb control. This mean you could run >>>400fsb (12x200) very easily. You don't even need fast ram, because both boards >>>allow you to run your ram slower than the fsb itself. >> >> >>Hey Aaron, >> >>I am planning to buy a dual Opteron 244(1.8 Ghz) soon. How much faster do you >>think it would be than a dual Xeon 3.06 Ghz? I've seen some test on website >>where the dual Opteron 242 (1.6Ghz) easily outperformed the Dual Xeon 2.8 Ghz. > >It really depends on the program itself and the compiler. With decent >optimizations I'm willing to bet it'd be 40% faster at the least. Here is the link where they compared a dual Opteron 242 to a dual Xeon 2.8 Ghz http://www.pcmag.com/image_popup/0,3003,s=25144&iid=23755,00.asp http://www.pcmag.com/image_popup/0,3003,s=25144&iid=23756,00.asp
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.