Author: margolies,marc
Date: 23:55:14 06/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
dear marc, first I did not deny anyone the write to speak second when jon jack mentioned the end of t-notes it is news and should be known. third when mr faber uses this as an opportunity to explore a person's life who is not a poster here, well perhaps he doesn't mean to be unkind, -- this place has a charter regarding fair use and computer chess. fourth while mr faber was probably not trolling he certainly invited respondents to examine causes for the cessation of a business relationship of a real working person in this country, raising a question as to why this happened is while not an outright accusation, an acknowledgement of unsavoury possibilities and also in invitation to insult a diligent member of the computer chess community. Therefore, marc van hal, why should I be inhibited to question faber's behavior by you if you think it is okay for faber to question maddox/Lopez behavior? Do you see the inconsistency in attacking here? I hope this end this. I truly wish you well. You may right to me personally about this if you want to and I will courteously respond. best regards, marc margolies On June 11, 2003 at 15:27:37, Marc van Hal wrote: >On June 11, 2003 at 12:02:52, margolies,marc wrote: > >>Mr Don Maddox writes in a mass email that Steve Lopez and he have seperated for >>reasons of economy. There is no purpose in insinuating anything else. >> >> >>On June 11, 2003 at 04:59:13, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>>On June 11, 2003 at 04:43:30, John Jack wrote: >>> >>>> Steve Lopez has left Chessbase and will no longer will be doing T Notes >>>> >>>> J.J >>> >>> >>>The answer to the question "why" might be interesting. > >ok when you say "He left for economic reasons" I asume he did. >But I don't see any reason why Harald can't ask such a question here. > >Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.