Author: margolies,marc
Date: 09:56:00 06/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
Michael, Of course I respect your opinion. And in general, a laissez-faire attitude from a censor is a very good thing. This poster is searching for like minded thieves to make connections. He shouldn't do it here. And the acceptablity of his post in this case is not a function of how persons here publicly respond to him. It becomes a function of whether he can get what he wants under the table from posting here and what will certainly follow can affect the legitimite dialogs here and who might chose to post here. Won't you please reconsider this kind of censorship and take prophalaxis? -marc On June 12, 2003 at 06:25:32, Mike Byrne wrote: >On June 12, 2003 at 02:23:02, margolies,marc wrote: > >>we should not facilitate or condone piracy here. th+row h+im back to rgcc > >looking at the original post, and taking it at face value --I felt it was ok. >The skeptic in me perceived saw the question as a "baiting" question to drum up >support for facilitating or condoning piracy. Were the thread to evolve into >that, it will be deleted without question. > > >It is also hard to take the question seriously as posed, as the author combined >the words "research" with "guesses". It may be a paper, but I would not >categorized it as a research paper in the context of how I would view a research >paper. > >Best, Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.