Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The Harald-Faber translator is usefull :-)

Author: Harald Faber

Date: 10:57:37 06/12/03

Go up one level in this thread


On June 12, 2003 at 10:08:30, Chessfun wrote:

>On June 12, 2003 at 09:40:50, Harald Faber wrote:
>
>>On June 12, 2003 at 08:29:28, Chessfun wrote:
>>
>>>On June 12, 2003 at 03:45:35, Harald Faber wrote:
>>>
>>>>On June 12, 2003 at 03:11:00, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Thanks for informing the majority of the CCC members, since any other language
>>>>>besides English only get the attention of a few readers.
>>>>>
>>>>>Pichard.
>>>>
>>>>- I am convinced that the main information is understood by MOST readers her.
>>>>- I find it arrogant to EXPECT english posts. English is RECOMMENDED here afaik
>>>>but no must. Or am I wrong?
>>>
>>>
>>>The simple FACT that you can write and read English and that the majority here
>>>read and write English, should be enough to motivate you to post in English.
>>>
>>>It isn't a question of right or wrong it's simple logic. You post because you
>>>want people to read but for some strange reason don't accept that more people
>>>will read the post if it's in English.
>>>
>>>Others that don't read and write English naturally can and should post in their
>>>native language. But it seems silly to post in a native language when you are
>>>capable of posting in a language most others understand.
>>>
>>>Sarah.
>>
>>
>>OK, for the 100th time:
>>Sometimes I am short on time and only copy&paste such match results from the
>>German boards. Absolutely knowing that MANY readers here appreciate that
>>information and understand it. I see nothing wrong in it, especially since I
>>translate them later on in mosts cases.
>
>Then again that was all you had to say instead of what you wrote in the post I
>replied too.
>
>Also again...since you find the time to always reply to these posts in English
>why not simply spend that time originally posting in English. After all it
>wasn't that long a post, how long would it have taken an exta ONE minute?.
>
>Sarah.


Sarah, we had this discussion so many times and you never understood my point.
As this time. I won't repeat it again and again. Read my answers to this thread
again, read Uris reply to your post and MAYBE you understand it THIS TIME.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.