Author: Chessfun
Date: 21:26:02 06/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 12, 2003 at 13:57:37, Harald Faber wrote: >On June 12, 2003 at 10:08:30, Chessfun wrote: > >>On June 12, 2003 at 09:40:50, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>>On June 12, 2003 at 08:29:28, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>>On June 12, 2003 at 03:45:35, Harald Faber wrote: >>>> >>>>>On June 12, 2003 at 03:11:00, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Thanks for informing the majority of the CCC members, since any other language >>>>>>besides English only get the attention of a few readers. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pichard. >>>>> >>>>>- I am convinced that the main information is understood by MOST readers her. >>>>>- I find it arrogant to EXPECT english posts. English is RECOMMENDED here afaik >>>>>but no must. Or am I wrong? >>>> >>>> >>>>The simple FACT that you can write and read English and that the majority here >>>>read and write English, should be enough to motivate you to post in English. >>>> >>>>It isn't a question of right or wrong it's simple logic. You post because you >>>>want people to read but for some strange reason don't accept that more people >>>>will read the post if it's in English. >>>> >>>>Others that don't read and write English naturally can and should post in their >>>>native language. But it seems silly to post in a native language when you are >>>>capable of posting in a language most others understand. >>>> >>>>Sarah. >>> >>> >>>OK, for the 100th time: >>>Sometimes I am short on time and only copy&paste such match results from the >>>German boards. Absolutely knowing that MANY readers here appreciate that >>>information and understand it. I see nothing wrong in it, especially since I >>>translate them later on in mosts cases. >> >>Then again that was all you had to say instead of what you wrote in the post I >>replied too. >> >>Also again...since you find the time to always reply to these posts in English >>why not simply spend that time originally posting in English. After all it >>wasn't that long a post, how long would it have taken an exta ONE minute?. >> >>Sarah. > > >Sarah, we had this discussion so many times and you never understood my point. Still don't, you write English, the majority read English, and it would take about a minute to have made the post in English. >As this time. I won't repeat it again and again. Read my answers to this thread >again, read Uris reply to your post and MAYBE you understand it THIS TIME. Sadly Uri's post read's like the blind leading the blind. Anyone who can make sense of that is welcome to it. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.