Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 10:45:45 06/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 2003 at 12:19:05, Chris Hull wrote: >Thank you, that is what I was looking for. > >Does anyone know the 9 and 10 ply numbers, they >were not included in the link. The poster said, "I don't think calculating the number of unique nodes at ply 9 is interesting because I think taking three-move repetition into account becomes important after 8 ply." There are already differences in the way people calculated shallower depths, due to different interpretations of the en passant rule. At some point it gets ridiculous, if you had to worry about 3-fold repetition, the 50 move rule, etc. I agree with him that there are other interesting problems, like finding the shallowest stalemate.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.