Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 11:36:48 06/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 2003 at 14:01:30, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >I believe that this kind of small improvements should be encouraged and >published. If you find a way to generate better opening books, publish it; if >you find a way to better evaluate the pawn structure, publish it; publish >everything, no matter what it is, it would be definitely more interesting than >those Go articles... Do you think the ICGA would publish such problem specific, minor improvements? Or would they prefer papers on Go that might be more generally applicable to AI in general? Maybe we need a new journal...the OJCC (Omid's Journal of Computer Chess) :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.