Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 12:15:50 06/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 2003 at 14:36:48, Russell Reagan wrote: >On June 13, 2003 at 14:01:30, Omid David Tabibi wrote: > >>I believe that this kind of small improvements should be encouraged and >>published. If you find a way to generate better opening books, publish it; if >>you find a way to better evaluate the pawn structure, publish it; publish >>everything, no matter what it is, it would be definitely more interesting than >>those Go articles... > >Do you think the ICGA would publish such problem specific, minor improvements? >Or would they prefer papers on Go that might be more generally applicable to AI >in general? There are many journals devoted to AI in general (AI, JAIR, etc). > >Maybe we need a new journal...the OJCC (Omid's Journal of Computer Chess) :) No, ICCA.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.