Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 16:05:13 06/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 12, 2003 at 22:41:57, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On June 11, 2003 at 18:48:54, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >extensively posted 2 years ago here. Believe me, I read all the posts about this. Never once did I see anything approaching real analysis for this. >just exchange the queen and then walk with the white king to g6 while >both bishop and king from black must prevent horrors at the queenside. 1-0. How very helpful *that* analysis is. >>On June 11, 2003 at 09:12:29, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On June 11, 2003 at 00:28:29, K. Burcham wrote: >>> >>>As proven 37.Qb6 WINS whereas 37.Be4?! which many programs in past times also >>>wanted to play, like crafty and diep at the first plies until they reach deeper >>>plies there than Deep Blue, that Be4 move is caused by big penalty for opposite >>>bishops in endgame after Qb6. >>> >>>However the opposite bishop endgame is simply won after Qb6. >> >> >>Can you please give SOME analysis to support your 'proof'. I don't believe that >>Qb6 wins, whether Be4 does or not.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.