Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 04:51:49 06/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 14, 2003 at 07:35:48, Ryan B. wrote: >On June 14, 2003 at 07:00:40, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On June 14, 2003 at 06:46:41, Tomas Casanovas Martinez wrote: >> >>>On June 14, 2003 at 05:37:18, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On June 14, 2003 at 04:59:09, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>>> >>>>>English: >>>>>We are going to start a long tournament at 120'/60 under the conditions >>>>>mentioned below. As you will see, we want to merely test the strength of the >>>>>engines. Therefore, the remis.ctg will be used instead of the own books. And >>>>>book learning is of course deactivated. Furthermore, the programs will have no >>>>>access to the EGTB so that we can see the proper endgame knowledge of the >>>>>engines. Hints about the outcome of this tournament are welcome. We are >>>>>publishing first results after 10 rounds. >>>>> >>>>>Deutsch: >>>>>Wir starten ein langes Turnier mit 120'/60 und den untenerwähnten Bedingungen. >>>>>Uns interessiert lediglich die reine Spielstärke der Programme. Deshalb wird >>>>>generell das Buch remis.ctg verwendet. Buchlernen ist selbstverständlich >>>>>deaktiviert. Und schliesslich haben die Programme auch keinen Zugriff auf die >>>>>Tablebases, so dass wir das reine Endspielwissen der Engines bewundern dürfen. >>>>>Prognosen über den Endstand dieses Turniers sind willkommen. Erste Resultate >>>>>werden wir nach 10 Runden bekanntgeben. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Conditions / Spielbedingungen >>>>>Tournament / Turnier RK 2003 >>>>>Time control / Spielstufe: 120'/60+60'/30+30' >>>>>Ath 1.3/64 MB hash [CT_15=48 MB] >>>>>ponder=off >>>>>book=remis.ctg [no book learning / kein Buchlernen] >>>>>EGTB=no / nein >>>>>8 participants / Teilnehmer >>>>>280 games / Partien >>>>>10 games for each engine vs other opponents / 10 Partien je Engine gegen alle >>>>>anderen >>>>>Tester: Rolf Bühler >>>>>Published by / Veröffentlichung via Kurt Utzinger >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Participants / Teilnehmer >>>>> >>>>>1) Chess Tiger 15 >>>>>2) CM9 SKR >>>>>3) Deep Sjeng 1.5 >>>>>4) Fritz 8.0.0.8 >>>>>5) Hiarcs 8 >>>>>6) Junior 8 >>>>>7) Ruffian 1.0.1 >>>>>8) Shredder 7.04 >>>> >>>>This is the outcome that I predict under these condictions, winner from top to >>>>bottom. >>>> >>>>Fritz 8.0.0.8 >>>>Shredder 7.04 >>>>CM9 SKR >>>>Junior8 >>>>Chess Tiger 15 >>>>Deep Sjeng 1.5 >>>>Ruffian 1.0.1 >>>>Hiarcs 8 >>>> >>>>Pichard >>> >>>This tourney looks pretty interesting, Kurt. My forecast is substantially >>>different: >>> >>>1.- Shredder 7.04 >>>2.- Fritz 8.0.0.8 >>>3 and 4 (about tied) Junior8 and CM9 SKR >>>5.- Chess Tiger 15 >>>6.- Hiarcs 8 >>>7.- Ruffian 1.0.1 >>>8.- Deep Sjeng 1.5 >>> >>>I have no seen yet one program able to beat Shredder 7.04 at the level you are >>>setting for your tourney. On the other hand, despite the clear improvement and >>>the good job made by Gian Carlo P., I do not expect that Deep Sjeng 1.5 can >>>avoid the last place. >>> >>>I will print my forecast and compare it later with the actual results of the >>>tourney. We will enjoy following it. >>> >>>Regards, >>> >>>Tom Casanovas >>>Barcelona - Spain. >> >> Hi Tom >> I am collecting the various forecasts. >> Kurt > >May seem crazy but I forecast >1.- Junior8 >2.- Shredder 7.04 >3.- Fritz 8.0.0.8 >4.- CM9 SKR >5.- Deep Sjeng 1.5 >6.- Chess Tiger 15 >7.- Hiarcs 8 >8.- Ruffian 1.0.1 (could be 7 if run in WB) > >My tests show J8 is great in long games and DS1.5 can be surprisingly good. I >can't wait to see the results. > >Ryan All these predictions seed Chesstiger to low !! ;) Mine, after 10 rounds (average points/eng:35) : 1) Junior 8 42 2) Shredder 7.04 41 3) Chess Tiger 15 38 4) Fritz 8.0.0.8 36 5) CM9 SKR 35 6) Hiarcs 8 31 7) Deep Sjeng 1.5 29 8) Ruffian 1.0.1 28
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.