Author: Rex
Date: 05:08:39 06/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
The same can be said by using the opening book. I would rather see use of the endgame and_do_away_with the opening book. Hate it when an opening book places a much stronger engine into a loosing position. This is cazy!! expecially when the stronger engine would never have played that line. On June 14, 2003 at 06:48:47, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On June 14, 2003 at 05:50:31, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >> Your example does not prove much. A difference of 5 Elo >> can't be noticed between two engines. And BTW, I have >> seen/read some time ago disputes about the question if >> the use of EGTB's would bring anything to increase playing >> strength http://f11.parsimony.net/forum16635/messages/49266.htm >> Kurt > >Tablebases might not have any significant impact on playing strength, but they >offer one important advantage from my viewpoint. They shorten games. Something >that one can learn to appreciate after watching two engines torture a drawn >ending for a couple of extra hours. If time isn't a problem then their use is >optional IMHO. > >Regards, >Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.