Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 07:19:29 06/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 2003 at 19:05:13, Jeremiah Penery wrote: You also might get member of ICCA and get journal june 1997. Seirawans judgement is no different from mine there. Best regards, Vincent >On June 12, 2003 at 22:41:57, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On June 11, 2003 at 18:48:54, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >> >>extensively posted 2 years ago here. > >Believe me, I read all the posts about this. Never once did I see anything >approaching real analysis for this. > >>just exchange the queen and then walk with the white king to g6 while >>both bishop and king from black must prevent horrors at the queenside. 1-0. > >How very helpful *that* analysis is. > >>>On June 11, 2003 at 09:12:29, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On June 11, 2003 at 00:28:29, K. Burcham wrote: >>>> >>>>As proven 37.Qb6 WINS whereas 37.Be4?! which many programs in past times also >>>>wanted to play, like crafty and diep at the first plies until they reach deeper >>>>plies there than Deep Blue, that Be4 move is caused by big penalty for opposite >>>>bishops in endgame after Qb6. >>>> >>>>However the opposite bishop endgame is simply won after Qb6. >>> >>> >>>Can you please give SOME analysis to support your 'proof'. I don't believe that >>>Qb6 wins, whether Be4 does or not.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.