Author: Brian Richardson
Date: 14:44:33 06/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 14, 2003 at 12:36:43, Sean Mintz wrote: >Here are my results (which is why I wonder about the quality of the >executables)... > >dual 1.34 ghz athlon mp's: > >--cut-- >EPD Kit revision date: 1996.04.21 >unable to open book file [./book.bin]. >book is disabled >unable to open book file [./books.bin]. > >Crafty v19.3 (1 cpus) > >White(1): mt=2 >max threads set to 2 >White(1): log on >White(1): hash 384m >hash table memory = 384M bytes. >White(1): hashp 24m >pawn hash table memory = 24M bytes. >White(1): bench >Running benchmark. . . >...... >Total nodes: 59491829 >Raw nodes per second: 1451020 >Total elapsed time: 41 >SMP time-to-ply measurement: 15.609756 >--cut-- > >Exact same test as you and my 1.34ghz athlons beat your 1.6 ghz athlons. > >You can get the executable I used from >ftp://newageoc.com/pub/crafty/c193smp-k7sse.zip I think the elapsed time is more important than nps. The Crafty from Bob's site ran in 39 seconds. I also used the executiable you cited and ran as follows: Total nodes: 59000520 Raw nodes per second: 1594608 Total elapsed time: 37 SMP time-to-ply measurement: 17.297297
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.