Author: John Merlino
Date: 15:45:09 06/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 14, 2003 at 17:12:58, Axel Schumacher wrote: >On June 14, 2003 at 15:54:55, John Merlino wrote: > >>On June 14, 2003 at 14:14:22, Axel Schumacher wrote: >> >>>In my comp-tourney: >>> >>> >>>Pyotr Novice 2.6 vs. Kace 0.8: >>> >>>[D] r7/p1p2kp1/1p2p2p/8/3r4/1n6/3q4/1K6 w - - 0 29 >>> >>>Stalemate :-) >>> >>>Axel >> >>Could you post the whole game? >> >>jm > > > > >Pyotr Novice 2.6 (1809) - Kace 0.8 (1884) [D30] >AxelsLiga2003 Toronto (3), 14.06.2003 > >1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.Qa4+ Bd7 5.Qc2 Bb4+ 6.Kd1 dxc4 7.Bg5 Bb5 8.Kc1 0-0 >9.e4 Nc6 10.Bxc4 Bxc4 11.Qxc4 h6 12.Bxf6 Qxf6 13.Kc2 Qg6 14.Kc1 Qxg2 15.Rd1 Qxf3 >16.h4 Qxe4 17.a4 Qxh4 18.Nc3 Qxf2 19.a5 Bxa5 20.Rxa5 Qf4+ 21.Rd2 Nxa5 22.Qb5 b6 >23.b3 Rfd8 24.Nd1 Rxd4 25.Ne3 Qxe3 26.Kb1 Qxd2 27.Qf1 Nxb3 28.Qxf7+ Kxf7 ½-½ Thanks for the game. Kace apparently has a serious greediness problem, as it played capturing moves much more often than it should have in this game. For example: 16...Qf4+ is better than Qxe4 17...Qf4+ is much better than Qxh4 19...Rad8 is much better than Bxa5 and, of course.... 27...Nxb3 throws away the half-point, whereas Qe3, Rd3, Rad8 and Qc3 are all a mate in 5. jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.