Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 00:16:39 10/21/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 1998 at 11:45:57, blass uri wrote: [snip] >>Why do we need hundreds, maybe thousands of games between computers to evaluate >>relative strength, when few dozens are more than needed for human GMs ? > >I do not think that few dozens are more than needed for human GMs Indeed, to become a GM a huge number of games must be played. Can anyone demonstrate a player given a GM title with only 'a few dozens' of games?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.