Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 15:08:17 06/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 2003 at 15:58:34, Peter Berger wrote: >On June 15, 2003 at 12:14:59, Mike Byrne wrote: > >>On June 15, 2003 at 10:24:16, Peter Berger wrote: >> >>>On June 15, 2003 at 10:20:54, ludicrous wrote: >>> >>>>Thanks, >>> >>>You can download it here: http://www.winboardengines.de/pepito/ under its >>>original name. >> >>Deep 9 was an unauthorized clone of Pepito. > >No, sorry to butt in again - Deep 9 _was_ Pepito, cloning suggests some changes >had been done to the code, for example Bionic was an honest Crafty clone, but it >was quite interesting, original and worth a download for a user , while Deep 9 >was _identical_ to Pepito for everthing besides its name and some renamed >variables which is still something else IMHO. not a big deal, but when I use the word "clone" - I meant it as "exactly the same" - I would have used "modified" to mean changes - the crafty I use is "modified" (you may use clone). I understand that in some usages, "clone" means very similiar and may not be "exactly the same" thus I understand where you coming from.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.