Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 20:12:04 06/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
The longer I think about it, the more I believe that this is a move inserted by the creator of the book to identify it's origin. It is badly loosing and has a N of zero. (zero games) Ernst. On June 15, 2003 at 16:00:17, Ernst Walet wrote: >You're right, but in the classic-interface-book Nf1 has a probability of 100%! >So it seems a book error to me, not a converting error. > >Regards, >Ernst. > > >On June 15, 2003 at 15:41:25, Alexander Kure wrote: > >>The reason why Shredder played 10. Nf1 is simple: it is in the book! >>When you have a look into the Shredder 7 book (Shredder7.ctg) there will be 2 >>moves, each with a probability of 50% to be played: 10. Re2 and 10. Nf1. >>Looks like a problem when converting from the original Shredder 7 book to the >>Chessbase format. >> >>Greetings >>Alex
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.