Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Status of EGT Generation: a view

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 08:05:29 06/16/03

Go up one level in this thread

On June 16, 2003 at 05:37:01, GuyHaworth wrote:

Hello Guy,

>Some work is concluding, showing that DTM(ate) is not the most efficient or
>effective metric to construct EGTs to.

What would you recommend as a better solution?

>Moving to a better non-DTM 'EGT regime' if I can call it that will involve a
>non-forward-compatible move - perfectly feasible for 3-5-man EGTs - but pays off
>increasingly as we go to 'more-man' endgames.

Could you explain what you mean by "non-forward-compatible move"?

Thanks,
Russell

• The nature of the move from DTM EGTs GuyHaworth 08:51:04 06/16/03
  • Re: The nature of the move from DTM EGTs Russell Reagan 10:58:46 06/16/03
    • Re: The nature of the move from DTM EGTs GuyHaworth 15:21:18 06/16/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.