Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is This a New Idea?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 10:08:41 06/17/03

Go up one level in this thread


On June 16, 2003 at 19:48:58, Bob Durrett wrote:

>
>I do not know whether or not this is a new idea.  Whether it is or not, does it
>have any merit?
>
>Idea:  Variable Hash Table size
>
>Someone said it is possible to have a hash table size too large, and sometimes
>too small.
>
>Why not let the program decide?  The operator may, or may not, wish to specify
>an absolute maximum size, but otherwise, the program itself would choose it's
>table size.
>
>The idea is that the table size could change during an individual game or
>analysis line.
>
>Bob D.


Crafty has done this for nearly a year.  The command is "adaptive" and
gives the expected NPS, and the min/max hash sizes for the normal transposition
table as well as the pawn hash table.

It works well, particularly on ICC where you can play a 1 minute game or
a 4 hour game.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.