Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:36:44 06/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 17, 2003 at 13:17:30, Dan Andersson wrote: > I think his point is that the castling rights might not matter if there is no >castling move in the position at hand. It seems a reasonable position. I could >ask a certified international arbiter next monday. > >MvH Dan Andersson I've never seen it interpreted in that way. Because the right to a future possible move was just lost, even if castling was not possible in the position just before moving the rook or king.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.