Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:36:44 06/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 17, 2003 at 13:17:30, Dan Andersson wrote: > I think his point is that the castling rights might not matter if there is no >castling move in the position at hand. It seems a reasonable position. I could >ask a certified international arbiter next monday. > >MvH Dan Andersson I've never seen it interpreted in that way. Because the right to a future possible move was just lost, even if castling was not possible in the position just before moving the rook or king.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.