Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Draw claims

Author: Tony Werten

Date: 02:37:23 06/18/03

Go up one level in this thread


On June 17, 2003 at 12:17:32, Thomas Mayer wrote:

>Hi José,
>
>>> I just had a discussion about draws in the winboard forum... In my mind
>>> there is the following theoretical game:
>
>[Event "Test game for Andreas"]
>[Site "Virtually in my head"]
>[Date "2003.06.17"]
>[White "Left part of my head v31"]
>[Black "Right part of my head v31"]
>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>[TimeControl "endless"]
>1. h3 h6 2. Rh2 Rh7 3. Rh1 Rh8 {in fact this is the first repetition, because
>of changed castling rights, Quark would think that it is NO repetition}
>4. Rh2 Rh7 5. Rh1 Rh8 6. Rh2 Rh7 7. Rh1 Rh8 1/2-1/2 {draw it would take Quark
>one repetition more to see that - of course I see no importance in this
>example, I have no problems with draws announced a bit to late if they are
>anyway correct - but I have problems with draws that are announced to early}
>
>>> After testing that with other GUIs (e.g. ChessBase) I found out that they do
>>> also not claim this as a draw after 7. ... Rh8 -> In my opinion this IS
>>> according to the rules draw, but the GUIs only claim draw after a
>>> theoretical 8. Rh2 Rh7... So who is right ?
>
>> The position after 7... Rh8 can be claimed as a draw according to the rules.
>> Even 6... Rh7 leads to a three-fold repetition (same position as after 2... Rh7
>> and 4... Rh7, both sides have lost the right to castle kingside). If the
>> programs or GUI are setted up to claim a draw as soon as allowed by the rules,
>> then there is something wrong somewhere if they do not after 6... Rh7
>
>when I am thinking about that game and playing on a board, I think it should be
>already claimed as a draw after 5. ... Rh8 ! Because it is the same position
>then after 1. ... h7 and 3. ... Rh8... I think that the castle rights do not
>play any role here, because afaik the rule goes a bit like this: Three fold
>repetition can be declared when a position occurs the third time with the same
>side to move and the same possible move - because after 1. ... h7 there is no
>draw possible, the possition after 5. ... Rh8 IS the same... What do you think ?

You are right. According to fide roles, it's not the castling rights that count,
but the castling moves. Since the same possible moves occur after 1.. h7, it's a
draw. You couldn't castle before (bishop, knight) or after Rh7 (rook moved), so
the position is the same. fe When there is a "ep move" wich can't be done
because of a pinned piece, the position before ep would also be counted the
same.



Tony

>
>Greets, Thomas



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.