Author: scott farrell
Date: 09:37:00 06/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 17, 2003 at 15:45:20, Dann Corbit wrote: This is for chompster ->1/3(4) 0.08 0.31secs 169 RxR+ KxR ->2/6(5) 0.08 0.431secs 947 RxR+ KxR QF5+ KD6 ->3/8(6) 4.16 0.541secs 4664 KH6 QA8 QF8+ KxR QxQ ->4/10(5) 4.11 0.591secs 9816 KH6 QA8 QF8+ KxR QxQ RD2 ->5/15(5) 4.11 0.982secs 51659 KH6 QA8 QF8+ KxR QxQ RD6+ KG5 RD2 ->6/17(6) 4.24 1.573secs 152957 KH6 RxR QF8+ KD7 QxQ RC2 QA7+ KE6 QD4 So did chompster do better than ruffian in this position? >E:\programme\winboard\ruffian>ruffian -h 300M -T \m33.epd -t 999 -p 20 >Hash size 314572800 >Ruffian 1.0.1 >feature done=0 >Loading configuration: ruffian.cfg >Warning: EGTB_HASH_SIZE changed, default=1048576, newvalue=8388608 >Logfile: Tue Jun 17 12:41:46 2003 >Total hash size 300M >Initializing tablebases: /programme/winboard/nalimov >Testing \m33.epd, 999 seconds, extra ply 20 >Testing: test 1 Solution: Kh6 > 1q1k4/2Rr4/8/2Q3K1/8/8/8/8 w - - > Depth Time Score Best line > 8/18 1.02 #33 Kh6 Rxc7 Qf8+ Kd7 Qxb8 Kd6 Kg5 > 8--> 1.59 #33 Kh6 Rxc7 Qf8+ Kd7 Qxb8 Kd6 Kg5 > > >Time: 1.59, cpu 37.74%, nodes 291341, nps 183233 >Hash: 128M, used 0%, hits 28% >EGTB: probs 176, hits 176 > >Best move: Kh6 (#33) Solved (1/1) > >Summery: 1/1
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.