Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 14:57:59 06/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 2003 at 16:12:28, Uri Blass wrote: >I see no absurd in it. >The thing can run on single processor so people could expect getting a single >processor version of it. The version used against Kasparov was the SMP version. This means that offering a slightly older SMP version for free doesn't make sense in light of pricey SMP version sold simultaneously. That isn't logical or fiscally lucid, hence absurd. >If chessbase cannot provide single processor version of the program then >they have to provide the SMP version. No, they don't. They can return the money to those that feel cheated. >If they do not do it then it is a good reason for the customers to boycott >chessbase. Not really. There are probably other reasons. Regards, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.