Author: Peter Stayne
Date: 17:22:34 06/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
If I remember the game correctly, Quantum-chess had used up 39 minutes of it's clock and lost on time at that point. The online commentators remarked seeing GM's and programmers shaking their heads saying, 'man, after 150 years, you'd think they would have licked that bug.' Anyways, I'm beta testing the new version of Quantum and it's results are pretty spectacular so far (3'+2" blitz match vs. Chad's Chess v0.15). Regards, Peter Stayne On June 19, 2003 at 15:13:43, Terry Giles wrote: > >A poser (just for fun) > >The perfect chess-playing machine 'Quantum-Chess' amazingly resigned its first >game after only twenty moves in its match against the current human world >champion Kay Sar. The Japanese GM opened the game with her favourite g4 and >after reaching an interesting and apparently equal position ‘Quantum-Chess' >promptly resigned. > >Question: Assuming the machine really can play perfect chess, and Kay Sar (3015 >elo) cannot, why did ‘Quantum-Chess’ resign?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.