Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Patent on chess moves

Author: Axel Schumacher

Date: 11:00:41 06/20/03

Go up one level in this thread


On June 20, 2003 at 12:26:14, Matthias Gemuh wrote:

>>
>>
>>If I were a GM and had to live from my tournament games, I would work for the
>>protection of my game scores! It is crazy, that we regard the scores as
>>freeware. Only because we can eaisily copy the moves, these moves are NOT free.
>>Of course the move e4 is free, but the information that I played it against
>>Kasparov is NOT free. You should pay for it.
>>
>>Anonymous players or spectators who distribute my moves would be hit by the law
>>of copyright because I have the right over my moves in a game.
>>
>>Look, people often have difficulties to understand: they say moves are not
>>copyrighted. I say that the specific moves of a game ARE copyrighted and
>>original. We should support the lives of our GM.
>>
>>Rolf Tueschen
>
>
>
>
>I even go a bit further and say the moves played by a GM should not only be
>copywrighted, but also patented !
>Any person who wants to play some of the moves should pay a patent fee.
>The patent should also cover moves played by strong computer programs.
>
>/Matthias.

What about this:
Everyone who owns a chessboard or a chesscomputer/program has to pay a monthly
fee (similar like the GEMA Gebuehren in germany for music; everyone who owns a
radio or TV has to pay this fee). Since you could play blindfold without a board
I suggest every person who can play chess at all has to pay this fee (maybe
10$/month ?). I will rush now to the patent office to patend the sicilian
opening..

Ciao
Axel



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.