Author: Harald Faber
Date: 00:44:17 06/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 2003 at 00:13:24, Terry McCracken wrote: >On June 20, 2003 at 18:56:43, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On June 20, 2003 at 12:59:01, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>On June 20, 2003 at 12:30:02, Harald Faber wrote: >>> >>>>Hi, >>>>the match is complete now. Junior 8 crushes Fritz 8.0.0.8 by 14.5-5.5. The most >>>>desastrous result I have seen so far for Fritz 8. I followed and looked at some >>>>games from round 10 on and must say, that Fritz 8 has been outplayed one game >>>>after another. Therefore Junior 8 - my personal opinion - absolutely deserves >>>>this clear win. >>>> >>>>Last match for Junior 8 is now against Chessmaster 9000 "Pillen". >>>> >>>>Games, results and intermediates at www.harald-faber.de >>> >>>Will you try Ver. 8.0.0.23 against Junior 8? >> >> >>No. For a simple reason: This engine version is buggy. Like the 8.0.0.19. >> >> >>>In two engine matches I played set for Blitz 4'+2", 100 Games each, Fritz >>>8.0.0.23 crushed Junior 8, by collecting about 67% of the points. >>>Terry >> >> >>This is absolutely not comparable with my setup. > >Yeah too buggy...well guess what, they _all_ have bugs, and Junior is no >exception. > >This doesn't mean 8.0.0.23 plays worse in games in general due to the Nxe4 Bug, >it may still play better overall. Despite of this Nxe4 bug? I doubt that. >I doubt my test is totally invalid. Why would it be? I didn't say your test is invalid. You are just using a totally different match setup (1 PC, 4'+2") than I do (2 PCs, 40/120'+60'). So it is VERY unlikely that your results fit to mine. >It should be tested as well IMHO. >Terry There can be tested so much more, Fritz 8.0.0.23, CM 9000, CM 9000 SKR, Ruffian e.g. At the moment it is not planned to test them, maybe I'll do it after my original test is complete.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.