Author: Tony Werten
Date: 06:46:45 06/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 2003 at 06:17:07, Uri Blass wrote: >[D]2qrr1k1/5ppp/8/5Q2/6B1/8/5PPP/5RK1 w - - 0 1 >[D]2qrr1k1/5ppp/8/5Q2/6Q1/8/5PPP/5RK1 w - - 0 1 >[D]2qrr1k1/5ppp/8/5B2/6B1/8/5PPP/5RK1 w - - 0 1 >[D]2qrr1k1/5ppp/8/5B2/8/8/5PPP/5RK1 w - - 0 1 > > >My question is if Rebel knows the expected material gain of white based on the >attack table. They will be wrong in case 1. The tables will indiciate no win or loss. Tony > >White wins a rook for a bishop at the square c8 in the first case. >White wins nothing in the second case. >White wins queen and rook for 2 bishops in the third case. >White win queen for a bishop in the 4th case. > >I see no way to use Ed attack tables to be right in all cases and my question is >in which cases Ed attack tables are wrong. > >If I understood correctly Rebel is wrong in the first one but I am not sure >about it. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.