Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 08:21:02 06/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 2003 at 06:17:07, Uri Blass wrote: >I see no way to use Ed attack tables to be right in all cases and my question is >in which cases Ed attack tables are wrong. I think the main advantage of Ed's attack tables is that in *most* positions, they are a good indicator of whether or not a move is good, so they can be used for very good move ordering. In a minority of positions, they will not search the best move first, but the time saved in all of the other nodes probably leads to a positive gain.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.