Author: Aaron Tay
Date: 09:21:19 06/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 2003 at 09:21:22, Sune Fischer wrote: >On June 21, 2003 at 09:11:40, Dana Turnmire wrote: > >>"In the actual case I was afraid that here has been suggested >>to mix up FRC with Shuffle Chess, which might lead to dilute >>Fischers ideas." >> >>Why are Fischer's ideas sacred? What would be wrong with having the best of >>both worlds? > >I think if there is no castle right it will be hard to view FRC as real chess. > >Castling is so much a part of chess, that without it FRC is a lesser game, >contrary to what it is supposed to be. Right, FRchess is designed to lead to normal looking middle games while eliminateing the opening book. This means allowing castling and ensuring that the 2 bishops must be of opposite colors. >-S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.