Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:03:33 06/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 2003 at 12:35:10, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: >Hi Jorge, > >you may of course test Shuffle Chess with those positions, >but do not call this to be Fischer Random Chess. > >Castling is essential to FRC, see following and related pages: >[http://www.rescon.de/Compu/fullchess3_e.html] . > >Reinhard Note that the programs may play FRC. All the moves that they play in shuffle chess are legal in FRC. The only problem is that they may not understand the moves of the opponent when the opponent tries to castle but this can be solved by using setboard instead of playing a move when the opponent tries to castle. I believe that shredder and Fritz are stronger than Baron and chispa inspite of the fact that they cannot consider castling but I may be wrong and the only way to know is to test. Note that not considering part of the moves is allowed and part of the programs do not consider underpromotion. I suggest that winboard or arena will send the program who know to play only regular chess the commands setboard and the time control after castling so it is going to be possible to play even with engines that do not know to castle in FRC. They may be weaker because of not considering castling but I do not know if the influence of this weakness is more than 150 elo and the top programs may be better than baron or betsy by at least 200 elo. Uri
This page took 0.04 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.