Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: No Castling - No FRC

Author: Frank Quisinsky

Date: 12:43:24 06/21/03

Go up one level in this thread


On June 21, 2003 at 15:17:23, Uri Blass wrote:

>On June 21, 2003 at 14:40:46, Frank Quisinsky wrote:
>
>>On June 21, 2003 at 14:37:04, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On June 21, 2003 at 14:32:15, Frank Quisinsky wrote:
>>>
>>>>On June 21, 2003 at 14:21:42, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>an FRC champion without knowledge about FRC rules :-))
>>>>I don't understand your posting.
>>>
>>>There was a world champion in computerchess that did not know about
>>>underpromotions.
>>>
>>>By the same logic it is possible to have a world champion in FRC that does not
>>>know the FRC rules.
>>>
>>>It only needs to be able to play by the rules and beat the opponents.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>Hi Uri,
>>
>>18 of 960 postions !!
>>
>>OK, we delete opening system A00 - E80.
>>The program where can play the best results with E81-E99 is computer chess
>>champion :-))
>>
>>Not my logic, sorry!
>>
>>Best
>>Frank
>
>You did not understand my post.
>I did not say to play only positions when castling is like normal chess.
>
>My point is that the interface may support also engines that do not know the
>rules and believe that they play shuffle chess.
>
>chess programs can play chess without knowing to underpromote so they can also
>play FRC without knowing about castling.
>
>Uri

Hi Uri,

shuffle chess is possible, of course!
But for FRC a chess program need a little bit code / knowledge.

You can not say ChessTiger or other programs play FRC ... this is wrong!
You can say ChessTiger or other programs can play Shuffle chess ... this is
right.

I hope I understand your posting ...

I say this ...
GUI and *__engine__* need FRC knowledge, only with GUI / Interface knowledge is
FRC not possible!

Best
Frank



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.