Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:49:23 06/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 2003 at 17:38:05, Slobodan R. Stojanovic wrote: >On June 21, 2003 at 17:25:06, Peter Berger wrote: > >>On June 21, 2003 at 17:22:57, Slobodan R. Stojanovic wrote: >> >>>I think you don´t understand the main idea: >>> >>>In FRC we have a move named "castling". It is FRC castling. >>>It shouldn´t be forbiden participation of engines that don´t know how to do FRC >>>castling, but they must recognize their opponents´ FRC castling. This is the >>>point. >> >>Great, so at last someone starts to listen. Uri's idea takes care of this! > > >No Peter. I don´t know what was Uri´s idea. I suspect that it was reduce FRC >name to Shuffle chess. No My idea was that the interface may send the engine FEN after the opponent castle and it may enable part of the winboard engines to play. They need to support setboard and they need not to have problem to play from a position when they get the time control and the time of both opponents for the a move that is not the first move. I can imagine that some programs may have problems with time management when the time control is not fisher time control. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.