Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:52:37 06/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 2003 at 14:46:22, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On June 21, 2003 at 14:14:46, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On June 21, 2003 at 14:03:14, Andrea Griffini wrote: >> >>>Sorry for the funky topic... but i wonder how do strong program >>>evaluate advanced pawns. I added a bonus table for free pawns >>>and multiple free pawns that get up to 300 when they're on the >>>7th rank >> >>3 pawns is too much. >>2 pawns is more logical. > >I would think this is too agressive. I would expect you would lose games for >silly reasons this way. I only said that static value of 2 pawns is more logical than static value of 3 pawns. I did not say that it is the best decision and I do not think that a static value is the right decision. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.