Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 15:24:03 06/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 2003 at 18:19:23, Sune Fischer wrote:
>IIRC they are given the start position and the moves made from there on, so that
>would include the latest castle.
>But it would be a small change in UCI to make it work I guess.
>
>I just don't see what good it would do, everytime one of the non-FRC engines
>lost the author would have an excuse or complain that his engine was being
>misused for something it wasn't designed for.
>
>You've heard how some complain about their engine being used with incremental
>clocks when it wasn't designed for it, I'm sure? ;)
I said it was _a_ solution, not a _good_ solution.
>When no knight moves are available anymore it will crash or lose
>on time.
This is legal, but I'll admit it's pretty poor chess. Don't forget the shortest
chess program is: printf("I resign\n"); Still legal!
:)
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.