Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 20:57:54 06/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 2003 at 17:49:23, Uri Blass wrote:
>On June 21, 2003 at 17:38:05, Slobodan R. Stojanovic wrote:
>
>>On June 21, 2003 at 17:25:06, Peter Berger wrote:
>>
>>>On June 21, 2003 at 17:22:57, Slobodan R. Stojanovic wrote:
>>>
>>>>I think you don´t understand the main idea:
>>>>
>>>>In FRC we have a move named "castling". It is FRC castling.
>>>>It shouldn´t be forbiden participation of engines that don´t know how to do FRC
>>>>castling, but they must recognize their opponents´ FRC castling. This is the
>>>>point.
>>>
>>>Great, so at last someone starts to listen. Uri's idea takes care of this!
>>
>>
>>No Peter. I don´t know what was Uri´s idea. I suspect that it was reduce FRC
>>name to Shuffle chess.
>
>No
>
>My idea was that the interface may send the engine FEN after the opponent castle
>and it may enable part of the winboard engines to play.
>
>They need to support setboard and they need not to have problem to play from a
>position when they get the time control and the time of both opponents for the a
>move that is not the first move.
>
>I can imagine that some programs may have problems with time management when the
>time control is not fisher time control.
>
>Uri
Uri, stop arguing.
They either CANNOT or DO NOT WANT TO understand your point.
Save your energy, or just ask them to (1) read your post again; take some rest;
goto (1);
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.