Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fischer Was Right

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 07:18:12 06/22/03

Go up one level in this thread


On June 22, 2003 at 09:05:16, Dana Turnmire wrote:

>Even as a lower class tournament player I remember going over my favorite
>English Opening, Orthodox Defense (Lasker Variation), or Caro-Kann Defense
>racking my brains trying to remember every variation I might run into.  At the
>professional level it must be maddening.  The strange paradox is computer chess
>may actually be the stimulus that kills classical chess as the mainstream
>popular form.
>
>Now that even grandmasters are starting to be dominated by desktop computer
>programs what is there left to be accomplished?  Computers may very well prove
>to be just as dominating in FRC as Classical chess but at least the computers
>will have to start at an even playing field without storing millions of opening
>moves that would be impossible for any human to memorize in order to avoid
>falling into a trap or some huge disadvantage before move 10.  I'm sure
>classical chess will always be played but I sense FRC will replace it sometime
>in the future.
>
>The real losers will be the publishers of Openings Manuals.  One question.  How
>long will it be before an opening manual is published on Fischer Random Chess
>Openings (FRCO 1)?

I think that the influence of opening book is not so big.

At least with white it is easy to get the opponent out of book in a few moves
and get an equal position.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.