Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fischer Was Right

Author: Dana Turnmire

Date: 10:26:14 06/22/03

Go up one level in this thread


On June 22, 2003 at 10:18:12, Uri Blass wrote:

>On June 22, 2003 at 09:05:16, Dana Turnmire wrote:
>
>>Even as a lower class tournament player I remember going over my favorite
>>English Opening, Orthodox Defense (Lasker Variation), or Caro-Kann Defense
>>racking my brains trying to remember every variation I might run into.  At the
>>professional level it must be maddening.  The strange paradox is computer chess
>>may actually be the stimulus that kills classical chess as the mainstream
>>popular form.
>>
>>Now that even grandmasters are starting to be dominated by desktop computer
>>programs what is there left to be accomplished?  Computers may very well prove
>>to be just as dominating in FRC as Classical chess but at least the computers
>>will have to start at an even playing field without storing millions of opening
>>moves that would be impossible for any human to memorize in order to avoid
>>falling into a trap or some huge disadvantage before move 10.  I'm sure
>>classical chess will always be played but I sense FRC will replace it sometime
>>in the future.
>>
>>The real losers will be the publishers of Openings Manuals.  One question.  How
>>long will it be before an opening manual is published on Fischer Random Chess
>>Openings (FRCO 1)?
>
>I think that the influence of opening book is not so big.
>
>At least with white it is easy to get the opponent out of book in a few moves
>and get an equal position.
>
>Uri

Didn't Kasparov make one out of order move in the Caro-Kann against Deep Blue
before he realized he had blundered into a lost postion?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.