Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 13:11:40 06/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 2003 at 15:25:25, Luis Smith wrote:
>>There are three reasons why the Deep junior should have won.
>>1). Junior 8 is about 6 months newer than Fritz 8, and should be more up to
>>date.
>
>Thats a good reason
>
>>2). Fritz 80023 is said to be weaker than Fritz 8008.
>
>I'm not sure how much stronger 8008 is than 80023, but I haven't done any tests
>personally
>
>>3). Junior is Deep, and Fritz is not.
>
>What does one program being "Deep" have anything to do with it? I hear it may
>cause a slowdown of 1-3% but there doesn't seem to be any benefit of being Deep
>over non-deep on a single processor
>
>>S.Taylor
This statement is correct provided both versions are
completely identical. This was not the case with Fritz7
and Deep Fritz7. The latter was remarkable stronger, even
on a single CPU.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.