Author: Sally Weltrop
Date: 05:02:00 06/23/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 2003 at 21:06:33, Aaron Gordon wrote: >On June 22, 2003 at 20:32:37, Dan Andersson wrote: > >> It can't be for speed if you buy a dual machine to do chess. For a quad it's a >>different matter. There you gain a little, not much. >> I'd wager the perception of reliability comes in play. Curiously enough the >>most problems I've had with any computer was with an all out Intel machine. Not >>that it was a terrible bother. Heck, my current SMP machine is an Intel one. >> I only think it would have been intersting to glean a bit about his reasons. >> >>MvH Dan Andersson > >You can also build a dual Athlon MP 3200+ (2.4ghz) barebones system (board, >chips, ram, case+psu, heatsink/fans, videocard, etc) for less than the price of >a single Xeon 3.06 cpu.. and the 2x3200+ would be faster. :) Gotta love it.. I see AMD ATHLON MP 3200+ at http://search.ebay.com/search/search.dll?cgiurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcgi.ebay.com%2Fws%2F&MfcISAPICommand=GetResult&ht=1&from=R7&ebaytag1=ebayreg&query=%22Athlon+MP%22&query2=Athlon+MP&search_option=3&exclude=&category0=&minPrice=&maxPrice=&ebaytag1code=0&st=&SortProperty=MetaEndSort going for $165 each! That's awfully cheap! Is this correct? Looks shady to me when reliable companies are seeling them for at least 3 X's the price.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.