Author: Harald Faber
Date: 06:27:37 06/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 2003 at 09:15:21, Lei , Shiann-Tzong wrote: >Too Terrible ! > >Junior 8 vs Fritz 8 = 14.5 - 5.5 Indeed amazing. Remember that this is Fritz 8.0.0.8, now I started testing Junior 8 vs. Fritz 8.0.0.23. I am curious how this match will end. >I consider test more games , can get more correct result . What is conidered to be a "correct" result? A result that someone expects? For me each result is correct. It might not reflect the strength relations that could be reached after 500 games, but they are correct. >If you can , add 20games in each match. This test already took me a month and recently I added 3 more 20-game-matches, another half a month testing. Sorry, this is enough. And all in all 100 games already say something. >Like SSDF test 40 games in each match ! I am not SSDF. Usually I don't play games that SSDF does, would be redundant work. SSDF has more resources than I have. >other way , Can you post your test hardware . >I can't see such info in your page , or I can't find out . Hm, it is under match conditions, but in German. Junior 8 always used an AMD XP1800+ (real 1533MHz) and 300MB hash (512MB SD-RAM) under Win2000. The opponents used an Intel Celeron 1400 (overclocked to 1539MHz) and also 300MB hash (512MB SD-RAM), except CM 9000 used 64MB hash, also Win2000. Time control was/is 40/120'+rest/60'. >Will you test Junior8 vs CT15 cb version ? No, I haven't got Chessbase Tiger 15 and will not pay twice for the same engine and a worse opening book. >Thanks in advance . > >LEI , Shiann-Tzong @ Taiwan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.