Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 10:35:43 06/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 2003 at 12:34:46, Helmut Conrady wrote:
>
>>OK, then I tell you a secret:
>>I have gone from CSS some time ago, don't know exactly, does not play a
>>role.Recently I wanted to inform the readers about my test games and results.
>>This post had no personal contents, only results. Guess what. It got deleted. So
>>I posted it with a different name.
>
>An Harald alias Peter Weiss,
>
>vielleicht sind folgende Daten geeignet, deiner Erinnerung auf die Sprünge zu
>helfen. Im CSS-Forum hast du am 11. Dezember 2002, 17:10:37 Uhr, unter der
>Überschrift "Und Tschüss" dein Abschiedsposting mit folgendem Satz beendet:
>"Macht's gut - wer bleibt, hat es nicht besser verdient." DANACH konnte man von
>dir einen Beitrag in der CSS-Sprechstunde mit Stefan Meyer-Kahlen lesen, ein
>Posting mit Testergebnissen unter deinem eigenen Namen und mehrere
>Lobhuldigungen ("sehr bekannter" und "beliebter" Tester "Harald Faber"), die du
>selbst unter einem Pseudonym schriebst, wie du selbst gerade angegeben hast.
>Inwieweit dies der Seriosität weiterer von dir veröffentlichter Testergebnisse
>und der Reputation im Allgemeinen für die Zukunft zuträglich ist, mag
>dahingestellt bleiben.
>
>Helmut
Helmut,
let me tell you a few things.
1) You are surely correct with the data.
2) Still - I would say, that you should not have done such a publication.
3) It is clear that Harald did not understand or know that you can see the
similarity of the IPs or whatever technical. So he pretended at first that he
did NOT write but only read. But Helmut, that is exactly the point:
4) Is Harald such a criminal that you have the right to prove him wrong in
public? I dont think so. Have you allowance like the police? As if Harald were
in a court case or a defendent in a murder case? Why then taking him his laast
shelter and secret?
5) As I said earlier: I am convinced that you in the staff of CSS do NOT respect
the human decency. That was also proven in my own case. But surely it was DS who
was the leading hero and not you. And I remind you: As Schachfan I did NEVER
write something that caused trouble or was an insult or such. Thomas M. accused
me of too "diplomatic" language so that nobody could attack me. You can follow
me? In the end people hunted me because they assumed that Schachfan was me. But
I didn't do something wrong. How then could the staff act against me? Because
Steinwender felt cheated because I told him that Friedel knew who I am and that
he should ask him if he wanted to know me. But Helmut, is that respecting human
decency? When I write only sober messages as Schachfan that you allow people to
hunt me. BTW the hunt started shortly after Steinwender got the information from
Friedel who I was. Can you follow me? - These are proven fact. Not insinuations
or allegations. You in the staff have clearly and provenly agendas when you
censor or delete. You dont follow democratic rules. Because how can I be deleted
or banned when I did NEVER write anything aggressive or insulting? Please
explain that.
6) As I said, the respecting of human decency affords a minimum of
sophistication, people with clear cut black and white thought processes must
forcedly fail because they see ghosts and can no longer think clearly. In your
staff there is only one very experienced and sophisticated guy. Hopefully Mike
is on the same ladder. I dont know you too good but when I read your
conversations in CSS when you try to discuss with the red name, I see a very
superficial reasoning guy who thinks that others are completely stupid because
they have no red colour. See the questions you asked Hagra just now. And you
accuse him of investigative journalism. Honestly Helmut, I would enjoy if Hagra
would be Friedel in disguise and that he would threw you out of the staff now.
You accuse people of too high intelligence. That is a completely new feature in
CSS... Fred must laugh when he sees it. - Ok, CL is a very good technical
expert, but he has no feeling for the thought processes of other people. DS - no
comment. :)
Do you need more data for the actual situation in your CSS team? Of course I
wait now for totally unknown but firmly representing CSS policy guys who write
how stupid I am and how evil and that I should shut up. But you cannot cheat me,
I know that these guys are fakes. See Harald Fabers message.
Again - if you had warned Harald by email and he would have corrected himself
then I would have respect for you, but playing the police here is way too much
you should do. You are misusing your "power" as a team member who has certaqin
technical internet information. And you misuse without a clear danger for CSS.
That is premature.
Please apologize to Harald.
Thanks,
Rolf
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.