Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Opteron > 970, Good article

Author: Tom Kerrigan

Date: 11:10:24 06/24/03

Go up one level in this thread

On June 24, 2003 at 14:02:02, Andreas Guettinger wrote:

>On June 24, 2003 at 10:15:48, Dan Andersson wrote:
>
>>http://www.haxial.com/spls-soapbox/apple-powermac-G5/
>
>I very good laugh indeed. The guy in the article compares G5/Xeon results using
>VeriTest compiled on gcc3.3 with Intel P4 results and another Dell WS with
>VeriTest compiled on Intel C++ 7.0 compiler.
>
>
>Compiler:
>Intel C++ 7.0 build 20021021Z
>        Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 7.0.9466 (libraries)
>
>The AMDs may be faster but you cannot compare benchmarks compiled with different
>compilers.

Sure you can. SPEC CPU is a CPU benchmark, not a CPU + gcc benchmark. You use
whatever compiler you can to get the best score possible to indicate raw CPU
performance.

-Tom

• Re: Opteron > 970, Good article Andreas Guettinger 11:23:10 06/24/03
  • Re: Opteron > 970, Good article Tom Kerrigan 11:34:46 06/24/03
  • Re: Opteron > 970, Good article Dann Corbit 11:26:09 06/24/03
    • Re: Opteron > 970, Good article Andreas Guettinger 12:10:57 06/24/03
      • Re: Opteron > 970, Good article Dann Corbit 13:01:34 06/24/03
        • Re: Opteron > 970, Good article Andreas Guettinger 13:19:35 06/24/03
        • Re: Opteron > 970, Good article Daniel Clausen 13:10:13 06/24/03
          • Re: Opteron > 970, Good article Tom Kerrigan 13:40:13 06/24/03
            • Re: Opteron > 970, Good article Albert Silver 09:44:46 06/25/03
              • "Tuning" is not uncommon Albert Silver 09:56:43 06/25/03
            • Re: Opteron > 970, Good article Daniel Clausen 14:13:54 06/24/03
      • Re: Opteron > 970, Good article Tom Kerrigan 12:40:02 06/24/03

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.