Author: Andreas Guettinger
Date: 12:04:22 06/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 2003 at 14:34:12, Dan Andersson wrote: > I think you missed the point. There was a heap of fudging. Apple did a >substitute of libraries for the G5. And the library is for single thread >execution. They applied oprimizations for the G5. They chose Fortran compiler. >And by some miracle all the canges favoured the G5 by a whopping 30%. That is >machitecture for you. > Their behaviour is even documented. So they stacked the deck big time. No >amount of arguing will ever change their underhandendness in this case. > >MvH Dan Andersson If you read the documenation then yo see that VeriTest performed this changes, not Apple. It's up to them how they to their test, I don't see the reason while suddenly everybody turns to Apple and points the finger at them "You faked it". cu Andy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.