Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 14:13:10 06/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 2003 at 17:02:42, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On June 24, 2003 at 14:02:02, Andreas Guettinger wrote: > >>On June 24, 2003 at 10:15:48, Dan Andersson wrote: >> >>>http://www.haxial.com/spls-soapbox/apple-powermac-G5/ >> >>I very good laugh indeed. The guy in the article compares G5/Xeon results using >>VeriTest compiled on gcc3.3 with Intel P4 results and another Dell WS with >>VeriTest compiled on Intel C++ 7.0 compiler. >> >> >>Compiler: >>Intel C++ 7.0 build 20021021Z >> Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 7.0.9466 (libraries) >> >>The AMDs may be faster but you cannot compare benchmarks compiled with different >>compilers. > >I understand why you think what you do. You want to see how different CPUs >perform running the exact same code. Allowing different binaries to be run on >the different CPUs seem to lose control over a variable you prefer to be held >constant. The "exact same code" is bogus anyway. gcc for PPC is obviously going to be extremely different from gcc for x86. -Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.