Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 17:10:15 06/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 2003 at 19:21:20, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >On June 24, 2003 at 17:02:42, Ricardo Gibert wrote: > >>On June 24, 2003 at 14:02:02, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >> >>>On June 24, 2003 at 10:15:48, Dan Andersson wrote: >>> >>>>http://www.haxial.com/spls-soapbox/apple-powermac-G5/ >>> >>>I very good laugh indeed. The guy in the article compares G5/Xeon results using >>>VeriTest compiled on gcc3.3 with Intel P4 results and another Dell WS with >>>VeriTest compiled on Intel C++ 7.0 compiler. >>> >>> >>>Compiler: >>>Intel C++ 7.0 build 20021021Z >>> Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 7.0.9466 (libraries) >>> >>>The AMDs may be faster but you cannot compare benchmarks compiled with different >>>compilers. >> >>I understand why you think what you do. You want to see how different CPUs >>perform running the exact same code. Allowing different binaries to be run on >>the different CPUs seem to lose control over a variable you prefer to be held >>constant. >> > >I think that's what Apple wanted to do. What I want to see doesen't matter.... >:) >They wanted to show that their CPU ist competitive. The "fastest computer on the >planet" was maybe a bit to much. ;) > >It all depends what you want. I try to avoid binaries for Intel, that's why I What processor do you use that doesn't run Intel binaries?? -Tom
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.